Victoria Hallebo
CTCS412 Paper
Outline
Professor Imre
Purpose /
Thesis: The purpose of this paper is to examine the canon of Disney princess
films from the 1990s until present, focusing on the division between the first
part of the period (‘89 – ‘98) and the second (’09 – ’13) after an 11-year gap.
Though there is a decided transition between the two periods in terms of
feminist backlash, both periods still convey a problematic post-feminist ideal
princess.
The following
princesses will be addressed:
1st
period:
Ariel, Belle,
Jasmine, Pocahontas, Mulan
2nd
period:
Tiana, Rapunzel,
Merida, Frozen (perhaps)
Note: Pocahontas
and Mulan aren’t necessarily princesses, but will be taken into consideration
due to their heroic sensibilities.
Though
it seems that I’m dismissing a large group of princesses, I don’t think it
necessary to address the original princesses (Snow White, Cinderella, etc.) because it’s fairly obvious the
way in which they enforce hetero-normative gender roles. I will, however, address them in passing if I
can contrast with a new generation princess.
I will first
address the early period princesses and the various problematic depictions as
backlash against 2nd wave feminism (noting the 30-year period in
which there wasn’t a single princess film because of the cultural upheaval at
the time). The majority of this analysis will be from source text (i.e. films),
but also with scholarly source when necessary. The focus on this section will lie in its use of post-feminism (for example: Arielle's use of body as power -- she literally has no voice or the relationship between Pocahontas and John Smith). I will then address the later
period of this new generation of princess through textual analysis. First
noting where the films are progressive and then where they fall into regression
under the weight of post-feminism. (For example: Tiana has a dream, yet it's actually the dream of her father's and her new princess status is what gets her the restaurant in the end). Linking specific films from one period to
another and showing the progression or stagnation as a result of cultural
pressures is also necessary. An example of this could be both Jasmine and
Merida’s force into betrothal by family and the ways in which both handle the
situation. Jasmine ends up still marrying the prince (well, sort of prince), while Merida does not get
married. She is, however, punished for her rejection of domestic responsibility
by an old witch (a cliché depiction of the hag).
In addition to
all of the films, a number of scholarly sources will be used including articles
and publications on Disney princesses (gender role portrayal, post-feminism and
Disney) along with feminist works (Gill, McRobbie, Mulvey, Garrison) focusing
on 3rd wave feminism, post-feminism and its emphasis on consumer
culture, and feminist backlash through pop culture.
In the grander
scheme of things, I would like to note that with its last film Brave, Disney is taking major
progressive steps in terms of a feminist depiction of a princess. This is
largely dependent on Frozen (which I
will be seeing next week), but if it is in alignment with Brave, then there is hope for Disney yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment