Course Description

At the core of the course is the question how feminism has become a demonized and ridiculed “F-word” in an age when issues of gender and sexuality are at the center of constant, often explosive political debates. These debates often connect media representation and political representation but tend to do so in simplistic ways that bypass or distort decades of sophisticated feminist theory and practice. We will trace back such representations through the decades around case studies that encompass film, video, television and new media practices. The case studies come from the United States and beyond, taking into full account the global interconnectedness of media production and consumption as well as the transnational travel of feminist ideas. The main goal of the course is to evaluate how useful feminist thinking is to understanding the relays between media and political representation; and to develop a lasting critical apparatus to analyzing the politics of gender and sexuality in the media.


Friday, November 15, 2013

Outline: Biphobic Tropes in Television

Bisexuality in American Television

                In my paper, I intend to present several profiles of bisexual characters in American TV shows, outlining the treatment they receive for their sexual orientation among their peers in the shows. I hope to focus primarily on Alice from The L Word, Piper from Orange is the New Black, and Brittany from Glee. While male bisexual characters are much less prevalent and not usually identified as such, I will discuss Frank Underwood from House of Cards.
I intend to argue that there are two discreet tropes written for bisexual characters. In the first, a character’s bisexuality is accepted and believed by the audience. Characters whose bisexual identities are not questioned are portrayed as aloof, confused, sex-crazed, and overly-emotional. I will focus on Glee and The L Word for this portion, and I will discuss how the characters are subjected to these stereotypes both by their fellow “in-world” peers on the shows themselves, as well as by the audiences who watch these shows. My analysis of this first trope will proceed in suggesting the need for more serious portrayals of out-bisexual characters, and it will criticize the usage of an “lgbt inclusive” image on the part of networks that do not treat bisexual characters as they do other queer characters.
The second discreet category examines the unacknowledged bisexual—character’s whose onscreen behavior indicates their attraction towards both men and women, but whose audience believes the character to be either gay or straight (usually gay). Rather than the first category, which is a result of uninformed or biphobic writing and can be corrected easily if the incentive should exist, this second category is an inevitable byproduct of the “coming out” storyline and will not disappear until the frequently used plot point does as well. For example, I will examine in depth the relationship Frank is revealed to have with an old college fraternity brother in House of Cards. The shock value in the revelation of this relationship rests on the assumption by the audience that Frank must be gay. In order to make this assumption, we must necessarily invalidate the genuine, self-professed feelings Frank has had with various women in previous episodes. I will also discuss Orange is the New Black, and the seeming-inability of any character on the show to consider the possibility that Piper may be attracted to men and women, despite her own self-stated attraction for male and female characters.
In constructing the frame of this paper, I will draw heavily from The B Word: Bisexuality in Contemporary Film and Television. Maria San Filippo uses this book to compile almost every article relevant to the topic, so I had used it as a primary resource in addition to the programs I will be citing. I intend to supplement this with additional articles as needed.

I hope to draw different conclusions from the two discreet categorizations of bisexual representation. For the first trope, I hope to conclude on the need for bisexual characters that do not play a stereotypical or comical-relief role and the impacts these have on representation for a group hard to “see”. For the second, I will argue that the elimination of “queer as conflict” plotlines is necessary not only for a progressive depiction of queer characters, but also as a necessary prerequisite for the serious depiction of any bisexual character. I hope to make a final conclusion that the alleviation of misogynistic standards in the television industry is necessary for the elimination of biphobic programming by analyzing the push for all bisexual characters to “really” be attracted to men, regardless of their own gender.

-Cara Fassino


No comments:

Post a Comment