Course Description

At the core of the course is the question how feminism has become a demonized and ridiculed “F-word” in an age when issues of gender and sexuality are at the center of constant, often explosive political debates. These debates often connect media representation and political representation but tend to do so in simplistic ways that bypass or distort decades of sophisticated feminist theory and practice. We will trace back such representations through the decades around case studies that encompass film, video, television and new media practices. The case studies come from the United States and beyond, taking into full account the global interconnectedness of media production and consumption as well as the transnational travel of feminist ideas. The main goal of the course is to evaluate how useful feminist thinking is to understanding the relays between media and political representation; and to develop a lasting critical apparatus to analyzing the politics of gender and sexuality in the media.


Saturday, November 2, 2013

Why do titles matter?


I recently wrote an article about why titles such as "Sexiest Woman Alive" are degrading and unnecessary and I thought it was relevant to some of the topics we cover in class.

On Oct. 7, Scarlett Johansson was named “Sexiest Woman Alive” by Esquire magazine for the second time since 2006, making her the only woman to reclaim the title. Though it comes as no surprise that people think Johansson is beautiful, naming her the sexiest woman alive is a blow to the self-esteem of every other woman in the world. Let’s face it: No one in this world looks exactly like Johansson, so therefore it’s a ludicrous idea to impose this so-called ideal upon society.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and thus it is unfair to force one magazine’s idea of the most beautiful woman upon society. Sexy comes in all different hair colors, eye colors, skin colors, shapes and sizes.
But Esquire magazine is not the only culprit. Each year, People magazine announces who the “Sexiest Man Alive” is, with past winners including George Clooney and Channing Tatum. The title of “Sexiest Man Alive,” though awarded by a magazine with a predominantly female readership, can have the same negative effects on society as the title of “Sexiest Woman Alive” does. Men are compelled to reevaluate their look, and others feel the need to reconsider what their ideal guy might look like.
In addition to giving women an ideal image of unattainable beauty, the notion of “Sexiest Woman Alive” convinces men that their significant other must look a certain way. Because Esquire is a magazine written for men, this title is virtually telling men what to look for in a woman. This brings self-image anxiety to not only women, but to men as well, who might feel compelled to date a woman deemed “sexy” by society’s standards.
In USA Today’s article about Johansson claiming the title, all that they mention is that this is the second time she won, a quote about her current career as an actress, and information on her engagement to a former French journalist.
There is no backstory about her life or how she became famous, and the very short article makes it seem like the only thing Scarlett Johansson is good for is named the “Sexiest Woman Alive.” If young girls want to look up to Johansson, there isn’t much that the title allows them to strive for.
With a long history of the media causing self-image issues in young adolescents, the “Sexiest Woman Alive” title does not help. According to AdMedia, “69 percent of girls concurred that models found in magazines had a major influence on their concept of what a perfect body shape should look like.”
And now with Scarlett Johansson’s image on the front of Esquire with the bolded words “Sexiest Woman Alive,” young women have something else to unfairly compare themselves to. It promotes the idea that Johansson is the objective standard of what beauty looks like.

No comments:

Post a Comment