Course Description
At the core of the course is the question how feminism has become a demonized and ridiculed “F-word” in an age when issues of gender and sexuality are at the center of constant, often explosive political debates. These debates often connect media representation and political representation but tend to do so in simplistic ways that bypass or distort decades of sophisticated feminist theory and practice. We will trace back such representations through the decades around case studies that encompass film, video, television and new media practices. The case studies come from the United States and beyond, taking into full account the global interconnectedness of media production and consumption as well as the transnational travel of feminist ideas. The main goal of the course is to evaluate how useful feminist thinking is to understanding the relays between media and political representation; and to develop a lasting critical apparatus to analyzing the politics of gender and sexuality in the media.
My jaw literally dropped when you brought up this website in class. How can Western women with Internet access, which by definition makes them privy to the outside world, still be stuck in a 1950’s mindset? Do women like this really exist, and if so, what corners of suburban America are they hiding in?
ReplyDeleteOn the one hand, I’m not sure why I was so surprised. I realize that this “domesticated woman” as an ideal is still perpetuated in many cultures around the world, particularly those with arranged marriages and forced assimilation. Nevertheless, seeing such a site in Western culture is at the same time jarring, comical, and disturbing. Yet, is it any more or less disturbing than sites that promote the men’s rights movement that, since the 1970s, has claimed an oppression of men partially due to an emerging female workforce and feminist movements? Is it any more distasteful than the lingerie sites themselves that promote bodily extremes?
I don’t mean to criticize domesticity as a whole. On the contrary, I am a lover of recipe blogs, scrapbooking idea, crafting books, and even cleaning techniques. I like the idea that DIY-ing something can bring a sense of fulfillment and hominess. But even with its wedding boards, PTA posts, and “gifts-for-him” tags, I would never consider sites like Pinterest or tumblr to be on the same level as this particular site. Not even Cosmopolitan, with its “1,365 ways to please your man” articles, has the same implied subservience and prostration (despite the insinuations to “lie down”) as this site has. Cosmo asks women to lay down with their men, but not to take anything lying down, as this blog so blatantly suggests. I would be interested to know who follows this blog, what type of every-day woman they cater to, and if this way of life is adapted post-marriage by its followers or if this mindset is something engrained at birth by a positively regressive style of parenting.